diff --git a/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/ui/DirectProfileDownloadActivity.kt b/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/ui/DirectProfileDownloadActivity.kt
index 9c4011a..a7983a5 100644
--- a/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/ui/DirectProfileDownloadActivity.kt
+++ b/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/ui/DirectProfileDownloadActivity.kt
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ package im.angry.openeuicc.ui
 import android.os.Bundle
 import androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatActivity
 import androidx.lifecycle.lifecycleScope
-import im.angry.openeuicc.util.*
+import im.angry.openeuicc.util.openEuiccApplication
 import kotlinx.coroutines.Dispatchers
 import kotlinx.coroutines.launch
 import kotlinx.coroutines.withContext
@@ -16,21 +16,8 @@ class DirectProfileDownloadActivity : AppCompatActivity(), SlotSelectFragment.Sl
                 openEuiccApplication.euiccChannelManager.enumerateEuiccChannels()
             }
 
-            val knownChannels = openEuiccApplication.euiccChannelManager.knownChannels
-            when {
-                knownChannels.isEmpty() -> {
-                    finish()
-                }
-                knownChannels.hasMultipleChips -> {
-                    SlotSelectFragment.newInstance()
-                        .show(supportFragmentManager, SlotSelectFragment.TAG)
-                }
-                else -> {
-                    // If the device has only one eSIM "chip" (but may be mapped to multiple slots),
-                    // we can skip the slot selection dialog since there is only one chip to save to.
-                    onSlotSelected(knownChannels[0].slotId, knownChannels[0].portId)
-                }
-            }
+            SlotSelectFragment.newInstance()
+                .show(supportFragmentManager, SlotSelectFragment.TAG)
         }
     }
 
diff --git a/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/util/TelephonyCompat.kt b/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/util/TelephonyCompat.kt
index 5c7d217..6636bc1 100644
--- a/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/util/TelephonyCompat.kt
+++ b/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/util/TelephonyCompat.kt
@@ -27,6 +27,34 @@ fun SEService.getUiccReaderCompat(slotNumber: Int): Reader {
     }
 }
 
+// Create an instance of OMAPI SEService in a manner that "makes sense" without unpredictable callbacks
+suspend fun connectSEService(context: Context): SEService = suspendCoroutine { cont ->
+    // Use a Mutex to make sure the continuation is run *after* the "service" variable is assigned
+    val lock = Mutex()
+    var service: SEService? = null
+    val callback = {
+        runBlocking {
+            lock.withLock {
+                cont.resume(service!!)
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    runBlocking {
+        // If this were not protected by a Mutex, callback might be run before service is even assigned
+        // Yes, we are on Android, we could have used something like a Handler, but we cannot really
+        // assume the coroutine is run on a thread that has a Handler. We either use our own HandlerThread
+        // (and then cleanup becomes an issue), or we use a lock
+        lock.withLock {
+            try {
+                service = SEService(context, { it.run() }, callback)
+            } catch (e: Exception) {
+                cont.resumeWithException(e)
+            }
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 /*
  * In the privileged version, the EuiccChannelManager should work
  * based on real Uicc{Card,Port}Info reported by TelephonyManager.
diff --git a/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/util/Utils.kt b/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/util/Utils.kt
index 5d4221e..6e6f162 100644
--- a/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/util/Utils.kt
+++ b/app-common/src/main/java/im/angry/openeuicc/util/Utils.kt
@@ -2,16 +2,8 @@ package im.angry.openeuicc.util
 
 import android.content.Context
 import android.content.pm.PackageManager
-import android.se.omapi.SEService
-import im.angry.openeuicc.core.EuiccChannel
-import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
-import kotlinx.coroutines.sync.Mutex
-import kotlinx.coroutines.sync.withLock
 import net.typeblog.lpac_jni.LocalProfileInfo
 import java.lang.RuntimeException
-import kotlin.coroutines.resume
-import kotlin.coroutines.resumeWithException
-import kotlin.coroutines.suspendCoroutine
 
 val Context.selfAppVersion: String
     get() =
@@ -23,35 +15,4 @@ val Context.selfAppVersion: String
         }
 
 val LocalProfileInfo.isEnabled: Boolean
-    get() = state == LocalProfileInfo.State.Enabled
-
-val List<EuiccChannel>.hasMultipleChips: Boolean
-    get() = distinctBy { it.slotId }.size > 1
-
-// Create an instance of OMAPI SEService in a manner that "makes sense" without unpredictable callbacks
-suspend fun connectSEService(context: Context): SEService = suspendCoroutine { cont ->
-    // Use a Mutex to make sure the continuation is run *after* the "service" variable is assigned
-    val lock = Mutex()
-    var service: SEService? = null
-    val callback = {
-        runBlocking {
-            lock.withLock {
-                cont.resume(service!!)
-            }
-        }
-    }
-
-    runBlocking {
-        // If this were not protected by a Mutex, callback might be run before service is even assigned
-        // Yes, we are on Android, we could have used something like a Handler, but we cannot really
-        // assume the coroutine is run on a thread that has a Handler. We either use our own HandlerThread
-        // (and then cleanup becomes an issue), or we use a lock
-        lock.withLock {
-            try {
-                service = SEService(context, { it.run() }, callback)
-            } catch (e: Exception) {
-                cont.resumeWithException(e)
-            }
-        }
-    }
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+    get() = state == LocalProfileInfo.State.Enabled
\ No newline at end of file