From 9bbc9ef2ae3aaa76db011cc11cd387a717e6c378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:34:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] numa: silence warning about return code of fscanf

Its not strictly needed but it doesn't hurt to check the return code of fscanf
and it keeps the compiler happy
Signed-off-by Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
---
 numa.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
index 26184a4..bc68bb9 100644
--- a/numa.c
+++ b/numa.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static void add_one_node(const char *nodename)
 	struct topo_obj *new;
 	char *cpustr;
 	FILE *f;
+	int ret;
 
 	new = calloc(1, sizeof(struct topo_obj));
 	if (!new)
@@ -63,8 +64,8 @@ static void add_one_node(const char *nodename)
 	if (ferror(f)) {
 		cpus_clear(new->mask);
 	} else {
-		fscanf(f, "%as", &cpustr);
-		if (!cpustr) {
+		ret = fscanf(f, "%as", &cpustr);
+		if (!ret || !cpustr) {
 			cpus_clear(new->mask);
 		} else {
 			cpumask_parse_user(cpustr, strlen(cpustr), new->mask);