widgets: Clarity whether spinner max is inclusive or exclusive

Currently the spinner uses exclusive max when wrapping from low to high
and inclusive max when wrapping from high to low. Fix this by adopting
*inclusive* max everywhere. The call sites are similarly confused.

Fix this!

Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel@redfelineninja.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Thompson 2021-01-12 20:22:44 +00:00
parent 9314eeafbc
commit 05310a82f8
3 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ class AlarmApp():
def __init__(self):
"""Initialize the application."""
self.active = widgets.Checkbox(104, 200)
self.hours = widgets.Spinner(50, 60, 0, 24, 2)
self.minutes = widgets.Spinner(130, 60, 0, 60, 2)
self.hours = widgets.Spinner(50, 60, 0, 23, 2)
self.minutes = widgets.Spinner(130, 60, 0, 59, 2)
self.hours.value = 7
self.ringing = False

View file

@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ class TimerApp():
def __init__(self):
"""Initialize the application."""
self.minutes = widgets.Spinner(50, 60, 0, 99, 2)
self.seconds = widgets.Spinner(130, 60, 0, 60, 2)
self.seconds = widgets.Spinner(130, 60, 0, 59, 2)
self.current_alarm = None
self.minutes.value = 10

View file

@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ class Spinner():
self.value = mn
def draw(self):
"""Draw the slider."""
"""Draw the spinner."""
draw = watch.drawable
im = self._im
fg = draw.lighten(wasp.system.theme('ui'), wasp.system.theme('contrast'))
@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ class Spinner():
else:
self.value -= 1
if self.value < im[2]:
self.value = im[3] - 1
self.value = im[3]
self.update()
return True