mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo
synced 2024-06-27 20:30:33 +02:00
722dab5286
# Background Golang template is not friendly for large projects, and Golang template team is quite slow, related: * `https://github.com/golang/go/issues/54450` Without upstream support, we can also have our solution to make HTML template functions support context. It helps a lot, the above Golang template issue `#54450` explains a lot: 1. It makes `{{Locale.Tr}}` could be used in any template, without passing unclear `(dict "root" . )` anymore. 2. More and more functions need `context`, like `avatar`, etc, we do not need to do `(dict "Context" $.Context)` anymore. 3. Many request-related functions could be shared by parent&children templates, like "user setting" / "system setting" See the test `TestScopedTemplateSetFuncMap`, one template set, two `Execute` calls with different `CtxFunc`. # The Solution Instead of waiting for upstream, this PR re-uses the escaped HTML template trees, use `AddParseTree` to add related templates/trees to a new template instance, then the new template instance can have its own FuncMap , the function calls in the template trees will always use the new template's FuncMap. `template.New` / `template.AddParseTree` / `adding-FuncMap` are all quite fast, so the performance is not affected. The details: 1. Make a new `html/template/Template` for `all` templates 2. Add template code to the `all` template 3. Freeze the `all` template, reset its exec func map, it shouldn't execute any template. 4. When a router wants to render a template by its `name` 1. Find the `name` in `all` 2. Find all its related sub templates 3. Escape all related templates (just like what the html template package does) 4. Add the escaped parse-trees of related templates into a new (scoped) `text/template/Template` 5. Add context-related func map into the new (scoped) text template 6. Execute the new (scoped) text template 7. To improve performance, the escaped templates are cached to `template sets` # FAQ ## There is a `unsafe` call, is this PR unsafe? This PR is safe. Golang has strict language definition, it's safe to do so: https://pkg.go.dev/unsafe#Pointer (1) Conversion of a *T1 to Pointer to *T2 ## What if Golang template supports such feature in the future? The public structs/interfaces/functions introduced by this PR is quite simple, the code of `HTMLRender` is not changed too much. It's very easy to switch to the official mechanism if there would be one. ## Does this PR change the template execution behavior? No, see the tests (welcome to design more tests if it's necessary) --------- Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io> Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com> Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
99 lines
2.3 KiB
Go
99 lines
2.3 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2023 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
package scopedtmpl
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"html/template"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"sync"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestScopedTemplateSetFuncMap(t *testing.T) {
|
|
all := template.New("")
|
|
|
|
all.Funcs(template.FuncMap{"CtxFunc": func(s string) string {
|
|
return "default"
|
|
}})
|
|
|
|
_, err := all.New("base").Parse(`{{CtxFunc "base"}}`)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
_, err = all.New("test").Parse(strings.TrimSpace(`
|
|
{{template "base"}}
|
|
{{CtxFunc "test"}}
|
|
{{template "base"}}
|
|
{{CtxFunc "test"}}
|
|
`))
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
ts, err := newScopedTemplateSet(all, "test")
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// try to use different CtxFunc to render concurrently
|
|
|
|
funcMap1 := template.FuncMap{
|
|
"CtxFunc": func(s string) string {
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
return s + "1"
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
funcMap2 := template.FuncMap{
|
|
"CtxFunc": func(s string) string {
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
return s + "2"
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
out1 := bytes.Buffer{}
|
|
out2 := bytes.Buffer{}
|
|
wg := sync.WaitGroup{}
|
|
wg.Add(2)
|
|
go func() {
|
|
err := ts.newExecutor(funcMap1).Execute(&out1, nil)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
wg.Done()
|
|
}()
|
|
go func() {
|
|
err := ts.newExecutor(funcMap2).Execute(&out2, nil)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
wg.Done()
|
|
}()
|
|
wg.Wait()
|
|
assert.Equal(t, "base1\ntest1\nbase1\ntest1", out1.String())
|
|
assert.Equal(t, "base2\ntest2\nbase2\ntest2", out2.String())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestScopedTemplateSetEscape(t *testing.T) {
|
|
all := template.New("")
|
|
_, err := all.New("base").Parse(`<a href="?q={{.param}}">{{.text}}</a>`)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
_, err = all.New("test").Parse(`{{template "base" .}}<form action="?q={{.param}}">{{.text}}</form>`)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
ts, err := newScopedTemplateSet(all, "test")
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
out := bytes.Buffer{}
|
|
err = ts.newExecutor(nil).Execute(&out, map[string]string{"param": "/", "text": "<"})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, `<a href="?q=%2f"><</a><form action="?q=%2f"><</form>`, out.String())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestScopedTemplateSetUnsafe(t *testing.T) {
|
|
all := template.New("")
|
|
_, err := all.New("test").Parse(`<a href="{{if true}}?{{end}}a={{.param}}"></a>`)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
_, err = newScopedTemplateSet(all, "test")
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, err, "appears in an ambiguous context within a URL")
|
|
}
|